Moxxie (
imp_resario) wrote in
dreamcrystals2022-12-08 12:24 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
A Matter Of Opinion
Sender: Moxxie
Subject: re: Armaments, traditions, and customs, vis-a-vis names
Reverein, I need a little help in resolving a minor dispute on a matter of opinion. And weapons.
Namely, the naming thereof.
Now, I've always had a mind for the classics in both music and literature, and giving a weapon a name all its own is a way of establishing personal significance, identity, and legacy, to say nothing of gravitas in recognition of or anticipation of the deeds ascribed to it. What, pray tell, would be Der Ring des Nibelungen without Nothung, the accursed sword of Siegfried? What would be the Arthurian legends without Excalibur or La Chanson de Roland without Durandal?
I would assert, therefore, that the practice is timeless, and has a well-earned place in the modern day, and with modern weaponry besides; that something like, for example, a shotgun can have enough significance to its wielder and within its deeds that it is no less worthy of being given a name than the weapons of old.
HOWEVER, in contrast, a certain colleague of mine does not share my views on this matter and describes the entire practice as, and I quote them directly,
"Cringe, T B H".
Which to me not only shows a lack of dramatic appreciation but also ignorance of the proud tradition upheld by the act of doing so. Thus I put it to a vote in a public forum before my fellow dreamers:
Is the practice of naming weapons really just a relic of a bygone sentimentality, or is it a timeless practice honoring the tools of the world's second-oldest trade?
Subject: re: Armaments, traditions, and customs, vis-a-vis names
Reverein, I need a little help in resolving a minor dispute on a matter of opinion. And weapons.
Namely, the naming thereof.
Now, I've always had a mind for the classics in both music and literature, and giving a weapon a name all its own is a way of establishing personal significance, identity, and legacy, to say nothing of gravitas in recognition of or anticipation of the deeds ascribed to it. What, pray tell, would be Der Ring des Nibelungen without Nothung, the accursed sword of Siegfried? What would be the Arthurian legends without Excalibur or La Chanson de Roland without Durandal?
I would assert, therefore, that the practice is timeless, and has a well-earned place in the modern day, and with modern weaponry besides; that something like, for example, a shotgun can have enough significance to its wielder and within its deeds that it is no less worthy of being given a name than the weapons of old.
HOWEVER, in contrast, a certain colleague of mine does not share my views on this matter and describes the entire practice as, and I quote them directly,
"Cringe, T B H".
Which to me not only shows a lack of dramatic appreciation but also ignorance of the proud tradition upheld by the act of doing so. Thus I put it to a vote in a public forum before my fellow dreamers:
Is the practice of naming weapons really just a relic of a bygone sentimentality, or is it a timeless practice honoring the tools of the world's second-oldest trade?
no subject
[ He knows it wasn't, but that last line feels like a personal attack anyway. ]
Finely crafted swords are, of course, very sharp. But the thing is, a sharp sword has to compensate in other areas, so usually a sharper sword is more brittle and likely to break like you said.
But proper maintenance can, for the most part, prevent that.
Since you sound like you come from a modern era with modern weaponry, I take that to mean you prefer weapons like guns instead of swords? Aren't more modern weapons impersonal?
no subject
Besides, don't you agree that being able to land a clean kill in one hit from a safe distance is simply practical?
no subject
That doesn't mean I don't get where you're coming from, though. It's just not a way I could live. I recognize that also means I might not live as long as someone else who prefers to take down their opponents from afar.
What's your line of work, though? Are you a mercenary?
no subject
Well, in Reverein, I've become part of an esteemed troupe of what you could call nightmare-hunters. And if you're going up against Noctaere that can teleport, bend the laws of physics, and casually bisect people with a swing of their pinky finger, you need to take every advantage you can get, right?
no subject
[ He had meant what his profession was back home, but in all fairness, he didn't stop to consider that his profession might be different here. ]
You're not wrong. It's a little humbling to be in Reverin for me. I was pretty good with a sword back home, but I'm not very good at dreamotion and a lot of the things here are very magical and a little out of my league.
So you're really able to combat all of that with your weapons?
no subject
Well
To be honest, one of my first big missions showed just how difficult it can be. We barely kept pace and kept alive, and I could scarcely land a hit with how my target was moving.
That fight was the first time I'd managed to accomplish anything big with dreamotion, too, though I haven't been able to do anything like it since. If anything it seems like anything impressive I manage by way of dreamotion is strictly involuntary.
But at least I know I'm not the only one who finds it difficult to use.
no subject
But I think you're right that, about dreamotion use being involuntary. I've tried a lot, and I can't consciously do it. Even when I get frustrated by my ability to do it, that doesn't even help like I thought it might.
Either way, I'm going to have to learn to get better at it because a sword isn't going to solve every problem here. I might find myself in a situation where I'd
breakbe killed if I can't get a handle on it.Wish I could offer you some tips on it, but I don't have any obviously. Maybe one of us will get lucky and figure out the secret?